AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme vs Z1 Extreme: Performance Analysis

Aug 1, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Slide 2
Slide 1
Slide 2
Slide 1

AMD's recently released Ryzen Z2 Extreme APU, unveiled at CES, aims to build upon the success of its popular Z1 and Z1 Extreme predecessors, which have been instrumental in powering leading handheld gaming devices. Despite an increase in graphical processing capabilities and memory speed, initial testing reveals that the performance uplift in real-world gaming scenarios is somewhat modest. This suggests that while specifications have improved, a key bottleneck persists, impacting the full potential of these advanced chips. The underlying challenge appears to lie in the shared memory architecture, where both the central processing unit and graphics processing unit contend for the same data pathways. This constraint limits how effectively the enhanced graphical units can operate, particularly under high load conditions. Consequently, users may find that the benefits of the Z2 Extreme are more pronounced in less demanding settings or when power consumption is scaled back.

The performance disparity between the Z1 Extreme and the new Z2 Extreme highlights a crucial aspect of integrated chip design for handheld gaming: the delicate balance between processing power and memory bandwidth. While AMD has equipped the Z2 Extreme with a more capable graphics section, including more compute units and an updated RDNA architecture, the shared memory pool acts as a significant constraint. This bottleneck means that even with more powerful processing capabilities, the system struggles to feed data to the GPU efficiently enough to achieve substantial frame rate increases in graphically intensive titles at higher resolutions and power limits. The implications of this are far-reaching for the future of handheld gaming, indicating that simply adding more computational cores or updating graphics architectures may not yield desired performance gains unless accompanied by parallel advancements in memory access and bandwidth. Addressing this memory limitation is paramount for unlocking the true potential of next-generation APUs in the portable gaming market.

Understanding the Performance Gap

The introduction of AMD's Ryzen Z2 Extreme APU has sparked considerable interest within the handheld gaming community, largely due to its enhanced specifications compared to the preceding Z1 Extreme. Enthusiasts were eager to see how the increased GPU compute units and upgraded RDNA 3.5 architecture would translate into tangible improvements in gaming performance. However, early benchmarks, particularly in demanding titles like Cyberpunk 2077, have revealed a surprisingly narrow performance lead. At higher power limits and resolutions, the Z2 Extreme offers only a marginal increase in frame rates, often just a few frames per second better than its predecessor. This outcome suggests that the raw computational power of the Z2 Extreme's GPU is not being fully leveraged, pointing towards a systemic bottleneck that prevents the chip from reaching its theoretical maximum performance.

A closer examination of the benchmark results indicates that the primary limiting factor for the Z2 Extreme's performance, especially at higher settings, is the shared memory bandwidth. While the Z2 Extreme features a 33% increase in GPU compute units and faster LPDDR5x-8000 RAM compared to the Z1 Extreme's LPDDR5x-7500, the overall memory bandwidth available to both the CPU and GPU remains a critical constraint. This means that even with more capable graphics hardware, the system struggles to supply data quickly enough to keep the increased number of shader cores fully utilized. The performance gap narrows considerably, and in some cases, the Z2 Extreme shows more significant gains, when resolutions and power limits are reduced. This is because lower settings impose less strain on the memory subsystem, allowing the more powerful GPU to operate more efficiently. Therefore, optimizing driver performance and enhancing the memory pipeline are crucial next steps for AMD to fully unlock the Z2 Extreme's capabilities.

The Memory Bandwidth Conundrum

The shared memory architecture in AMD's APUs, where both the central processing unit and the integrated graphics processing unit draw from the same memory pool, presents a significant design challenge that directly impacts gaming performance. While the Ryzen Z2 Extreme boasts advancements in its GPU section, including a higher count of RDNA 3.5 compute units, these improvements are frequently hampered by the inherent limitations of memory bandwidth. The data shared in benchmarks, such as those from ETA Prime, clearly illustrates that a marginal increase in bandwidth—only 7% more in the MSI Claw A8 compared to the Asus ROG Ally X—is insufficient to accommodate the needs of a more powerful GPU when operating at full capacity. This constraint becomes particularly evident in scenarios requiring high data throughput, such as running games at high resolutions and power settings.

The observed performance trends across various games and power configurations consistently underscore the critical role of memory bandwidth. When the system is operating under less demanding conditions, such as at lower resolutions or reduced power limits, the memory subsystem faces less pressure, allowing the Z2 Extreme's improved GPU to exhibit more noticeable performance advantages. This behavior is not unique to the Z2 Extreme; similar patterns have been observed in other high-performance integrated chips like the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. The need for a wider memory bus, as seen in AMD's Strix Halo APUs with their 256-bit bus, is a clear acknowledgement of this challenge. While increasing shader cores is a step forward, the ultimate determinant of an APU's gaming prowess lies in its ability to efficiently transfer data. This highlights that future advancements in handheld gaming APUs will heavily rely on breakthroughs in memory technology and architecture to alleviate existing bandwidth bottlenecks, ensuring that powerful integrated graphics can realize their full potential.