Ben & Jerry's Co-founder Resigns Over Social Mission Dispute with Unilever

Sep 17, 2025 at 2:00 PM
Jerry Greenfield, a co-founder of the renowned ice cream company Ben & Jerry's, has stepped down from his position. His resignation stems from a fundamental disagreement with the parent company, Unilever, regarding the ice cream brand's commitment to social activism. Greenfield asserts that Unilever has failed to honor the original terms of their acquisition agreement, which guaranteed Ben & Jerry's autonomy in addressing social and political matters. This ongoing conflict highlights the challenges of maintaining a brand's core values when integrated into a larger corporate structure.

Upholding Values: A Sweet but Contentious Legacy

The Departure of a Visionary: Jerry Greenfield's Resignation from Ben & Jerry's

After nearly five decades, Jerry Greenfield, a pivotal figure in the creation of Ben & Jerry's, has announced his departure. This decision, conveyed through a letter shared by co-founder Ben Cohen, signifies a significant moment for the socially conscious ice cream enterprise. Greenfield's resignation is a direct consequence of his belief that Unilever, the corporate entity that acquired Ben & Jerry's, has not adhered to its commitments regarding the brand's social justice initiatives.

The Battle for Brand Independence: Unilever's Alleged Breach of Agreement

Greenfield asserts that the unique merger agreement struck with Unilever two decades ago was intended to safeguard Ben & Jerry's social mission and ethical principles within its governance framework indefinitely. A crucial component of this agreement was the brand's right to express its views on social issues without corporate interference. Greenfield now contends that this promised autonomy has been eroded, leading to a compromise of the brand's core identity.

Beyond the Scoop: Ben & Jerry's Enduring Commitment to Justice

From its inception, Ben & Jerry's was conceived as more than just a purveyor of frozen treats. Greenfield and Cohen consistently held that their commitment to values and the pursuit of justice superseded the commercial interests of the company itself. This ethos has been a hallmark of the brand, distinguishing it in the marketplace and attracting consumers who share its social concerns.

A Legacy Honored, a Dialogue Ongoing: Unilever's Response to Greenfield's Stance

Ben Cohen underscored the importance of Greenfield's decision, stating that his legacy must remain aligned with their shared values. In response, Unilever's Magnum Ice Cream Co., which oversees Ben & Jerry's, acknowledged Greenfield's contributions, expressing gratitude for his role in establishing the brand and its dedication to social causes. While disagreeing with Greenfield's interpretation of events, Unilever affirmed its commitment to engaging both founders in constructive discussions aimed at bolstering Ben & Jerry's values-driven presence globally.

Maintaining the Core: The Future Direction of Ben & Jerry's

Despite the recent developments, Magnum Ice Cream Co. affirmed its dedication to upholding the foundational principles of Ben & Jerry's: a legacy rooted in peace, love, and, of course, ice cream. This commitment suggests an ongoing effort to balance commercial imperatives with the brand's deeply ingrained social conscience.

Clashing Ideologies: Past Disagreements on Social and Political Issues

This is not the first instance of a divergence in opinion between the co-founders and Unilever concerning social issues. Previous disputes have included a lawsuit filed by the co-founders against Unilever, alleging that the company attempted to stifle Ben & Jerry's support for Palestinians amidst the conflict in Gaza. Such instances underscore the inherent tension when a mission-driven brand operates under the umbrella of a large multinational corporation.